Project

General

Profile

Bug #23577

Cannot bind vlan interface to SSH service

Added by Shawn Cox over 3 years ago. Updated about 3 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Nice to have
Assignee:
William Grzybowski
Category:
Middleware
Target version:
Seen in:
TrueNAS - TrueNAS-9.10.2
Severity:
New
Reason for Closing:
Reason for Blocked:
Needs QA:
Yes
Needs Doc:
Yes
Needs Merging:
Yes
Needs Automation:
No
Support Suite Ticket:
n/a
Hardware Configuration:
ChangeLog Required:
No

Description

Not sure if this is intentional or not. I've tested this on our lab system and produce the same results with a vlan interface.

Under Services>SSH>Advanced Mode>Extra Options, if I use ListenAddress "vlanip", is that a better method than forcing it to bind?

Associated revisions

Revision a324373c (diff)
Added by William Grzybowski over 3 years ago

fix(gui): allow to bind to vlan in SSH Ticket: #23577

Revision 69153ccd (diff)
Added by William Grzybowski over 3 years ago

fix(gui): allow to bind to vlan in SSH Ticket: #23577 (cherry picked from commit a324373cdd23b8f35fc328db9eb5265b26e90bc8)

History

#1 Avatar?id=14398&size=24x24 Updated by Kris Moore over 3 years ago

  • Assignee set to William Grzybowski

#2 Updated by William Grzybowski over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Unscreened to Screened
  • Priority changed from No priority to Nice to have
  • Target version set to 11.0

#3 Updated by William Grzybowski over 3 years ago

  • Project changed from TrueNAS to FreeNAS
  • Category changed from 43 to 20
  • Target version changed from 11.0 to 11.0
  • Private changed from No to Yes

#4 Updated by William Grzybowski over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Screened to Needs Developer Review
  • Assignee changed from William Grzybowski to Marcelo Araujo

#5 Updated by Marcelo Araujo over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Needs Developer Review to Unscreened
  • Assignee changed from Marcelo Araujo to William Grzybowski

Hi,

That part seems OK, I'm wondering if we do need migration too, don't we?

br,

#6 Updated by William Grzybowski over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Unscreened to Needs Developer Review
  • Assignee changed from William Grzybowski to Marcelo Araujo

Marcelo Araujo wrote:

Hi,

That part seems OK, I'm wondering if we do need migration too, don't we?

br,

Migration? Why? No.

#7 Updated by Marcelo Araujo over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Needs Developer Review to Reviewed
  • Assignee changed from Marcelo Araujo to William Grzybowski

#8 Updated by Vaibhav Chauhan over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Reviewed to Merged

#9 Updated by Vaibhav Chauhan over 3 years ago

  • Target version changed from 11.0 to 11.0-RC3

#10 Updated by Vaibhav Chauhan over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Merged to Resolved

#11 Updated by Dru Lavigne about 3 years ago

  • File deleted (Screenshot_from_2017-04-25_15-39-47.png)

#12 Updated by Dru Lavigne about 3 years ago

  • Private changed from Yes to No

Also available in: Atom PDF